Fight Immigration & Save the Poor

Christian Cultural Marxists believe God wants Christians to encourage the mass migration of Third World immigrants into their nations. To these social justice warriors (SJWs), allowing the invasion of our homelands is “helping the stranger” and “loving our neighbors.”

Little thought, however, is given to the negative effects this course of action will have upon our actual neighbors, friends, family members, and communities. The SJWs never think to love these people. They never think about the inevitable job losses, decreased wages,  and increased crime rates that disproportionately effect lower class European Americans when the labor markets become crowded, competition for middle class wages increases, and Third World criminality is imported into their formally functional communities. [1] [2]

Upper middle class immigration advocates refuse to love their countrymen because they stand to personally gain from the moral posturing that accompanies endorsing liberal causes. They want to remain “relevant” to the multicultural establishment, and avoid being labeled “racist” or “xenophobic.”

Christian media thought leaders possess the money and resources to escape deteriorating communities overrun with Third World invaders. Their working class neighbors do not share this opportunity. 

Poor European Americans remain trapped in dysfunction as their home values decline from the negative trends that accompany ethnic diversity. Their kids are forced to attend failing schools with low IQ foreigners  and dangerous Afroethnic/Latino gangs. [3]

The plight of poorer Euroethnic families is irrelevant to the selfish upwardly mobile Christians who can afford to transfer their kids to suburban schools and participate in “white flight” exits from newly immigrant dominanted locations. Because this class of European Americans usually attends college and possesses greater job opportunities, they rarely feel the consequences of the increased labor competition they create by allowing millions of low skilled workers into the country. They hurl their poorer cousins under the immigrant wave to win social points with less “racist” employers and organizations who dominate the mainstream means to economic success. They sell out their ethnic kin to gain access to the resources necessary to relocate their families to safer and less diverse regions, or move into gated communities and private schools.

Euro-Americans abandoned by white flight cannot escape the erasure of their communities by Third World invasion. They are left to suffer in decaying neighborhoods, collapsing infrastructure, failing schools, perpetual crime waves, and socio-cultural dispossession. They cannot find jobs because businesses become minority managed or simply cease operating in the midst of urban decay. High job competition reduces their wages. They cannot feel secure for fear of being assaulted, killed, or robbed. Their children cannot receive good educations surrounded by low IQ ethnicities. In short, their communities experience a social capital collapse which eliminates trust and depresses the psyche. As diversity increases, social capital declines. [4]

The cost of immigration is the destruction of low income American communities as viable centers of human expression.
When a community is united by common experiences, culture, language, religion, and ethnicity it thrives through cooperation. The residents understand one another and work together on common projects. They trust one another because they have similar outlooks on life and welfare. “Birds of a feather flock together” and form organically functioning institutions and goals.

When ethnic pluralism invades a community, however, this sense of similarity and cooperation breaks down. People begin suspecting their neighbors of working to displace them and undermine their values (this suspicion often proves accurate). The ethnic “other” is a threat claim on the community’s limited resources and space. Diversity yields conflict and distrust in every area it infects.

Ethnic pluralism produces cultural rifts threatening communal rituals and artistic expression. Murals, monuments, parades, holiday celebrations, sporting interests, and religious norms are threatened by the presence of the ethnic “other.” Conflict arises when a foreign ethnicity takes offense to the cultural expressions of the native population. Every aspect of communal life becomes a battleground upon which the ethnic “other” and the native population must war. The more different two ethnicities are the greater their clash.

Sometimes, differences are small enough to allow new communal identity to arise after brief conflict. In the case of twenty-first century America, however, the differences between Third World invaders and native European Americans are so vast that united community is improbable. The gulf in historical outlook, religion, genetic differences in intelligence and temperament, and language is too great for significant common ground to arise. In the case of Latinos, African Americans, and Euroethnics, history is a “winner take all” situation in which the interests of one population run contrary to the interests of the others. The space for compromise is limited.

Christian Cultural Marxists would have poorer European Americans erase themselves in these community battles. They would exhort the working classes to sacrifice their own communal heritage and melt into the ethnic identity of those who invaded their hometowns and neighborhoods. They argue these Christians should die to their own identities just as Christ sacrificed himself for the broader unity of mankind. In admonishing such a course, however, these SJWs reveal their deep hypocrisy by moving themselves and their families out of conflict ridden communities and maintaining their culture and heritage in predominantly Caucasian suburbs and wealthy enclaves. They are unwilling to accept their own calls for erasure. The loudest diversity advocates usually live in ethnically homogeneous communities.

Poorer European Americans who oppose immigration are protecting their families, loved ones, friends, and neighbors. By opposing an invasion of disproportionately criminal aliens into their hometowns and country they proactively love their neighbors by protecting their community and institutions. They love their neighbors by saving them from rape, murder, assault, joblessness, dysfunctional schools, robbery, and urban decay. They shield their children from being discriminated against with affirmative action and the prejudiced hiring practices characteristic of minority managed businesses. They save the collective psyche of their neighbors from the dehumanizing experience of having one’s culture and communal rituals stripped from public use.

Jesus instructed us to love our neighbors. Third World immigration is not love. Advocating invasion is a form of hate against one’s countrymen and reckless neglect towards their communities, institutions, economic welfare, culture, and bodies. No one can assist the elimination of another person’s social network and welfare without exhibiting hate. Christian Cultural Marxists who push Third World invasion are sick in mind and soul when they champion the destruction of their cousin’s welfare. They sin against poor European American Christians who represent their ethnic brothers. Their betrayal is shameful.

The Apostle Paul told Timothy that a person who does not provide for his family is worse than an infidel. The poor have a God given obligation to fight immigration to provide safety, education, welfare, and community for their family members.

God has called Christians to defend the poor and do unto others as we would have them do for us. The best way we can love our neighbors is to fight immigration and diversity.


[1] Camarota, Steven and Karen Zeigler. “For Every New Job, Two New Immigrants.” February, 2015. Accessed December 20, 2015.
EXCERPT: “Government data collected in December 2014 show 18 million immigrants (legal and illegal) living in the United States who arrived in January 2000 or later. But only 9.3 million jobs were added over this time period. In addition, the native-born population 16 and older grew by 25.2 million. Because job growth has not come close to matching immigration and population growth, the share of Americans in the labor force has declined dramatically — a clear indication there is no labor shortage… Congress's disregard for the absorption capacity of the U.S. labor market has profound consequences for American workers… this record immigration has occurred at a time when job growth has not even kept pace with natural population increase, let alone new immigration. Unfortunately, policy-makers have given little though to the adsorption capacity of the U.S. labor market when formulating immigration policy.”

[2] Gemma, Peter. “Illegal Alien Crime and Violence by the Numbers: We’re All Victims.” Constitution Party. Accessed December 20, 2015. Via: Grant, J.C. “Illegal immigration rates strongly correlated with car thefts,” June 4, 2010;
EXCERPT: “ writer J.C. Grant notes, ‘There is a statistically significant correlation between state per capita illegal immigration rates and car thefts. This correlation is particularly strong: the odds are less than two in one million that the correlation is a chance occurrence.’”
Farah, Joseph. “Illegal Aliens Murder 12 Americans Daily.” World Net Daily. November, 2006. Accessed December 20, 2015. 
EXCERPT: “Twelve Americans are murdered every day by illegal aliens, according to statistics released by Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa. If those numbers are correct, it translates to 4,380 Americans murdered annually by illegal aliens. That’s 21,900 since Sept. 11, 2001. Total U.S. troop deaths in Iraq as of last week were reported at 2,863. Total U.S. troop deaths in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Uzbekistan during the five years of the Afghan campaign are currently at 289, according to the Department of Defense.”
Gemma, Peter. “Illegal Alien Crime and Violence by the Numbers: We’re All Victims.” Constitution Party. Accessed December 20, 2015. Via: “Gemma, Peter. “Illegal Alien Crime and Violence by the Numbers: We’re All Victims.”
Constitution Party. Accessed December 20, 2015.
EXCERPT: “An FBI crime study also shows heavy illegal alien involvement in criminal activity revealed these statistics: 75 percent of those on the most wanted criminals list in Los Angeles, Phoenix and Albuquerque are illegal aliens. One quarter of all inmates in California detention centers are Mexican nationals, as are more than 40 percent of all inmates in Arizona and 48 percent in New Mexico jails. Over 53 percent of all investigated burglaries reported in California, New Mexico, Nevada, Arizona, and Texas are perpetrated by illegal aliens. 63 percent of cited drivers in Arizona have no license, no insurance and no registration for the vehicle. Of that number, 97 percent are illegal aliens. 66 percent of cited drivers in New Mexico have no license, no insurance and no registration for the vehicle. Of that 66 percent, 98 percent are illegal aliens.”

[3] Richwine, Jason. “IQ and Immigration Policy.” Via: Matthews, Dylan. “Heritage study co-author opposes letting in immigrants with low IQs.” May, 2013. Accessed December 20, 2015.
EXCERPT: “The statistical construct known as IQ can reliably estimate general mental ability, or intelligence. The average IQ of immigrants in the United States is substantially lower than that of the white native population, and the difference is likely to persist over several generations. The consequences are a lack of socioeconomic assimilation among low-IQ immigrant groups, more underclass behavior, less social trust, and an increase in the proportion of unskilled workers in the American labor market. Selecting high-IQ immigrants would ameliorate these problems in the U.S., while at the same time benefiting smart potential immigrants who lack educational access in their home countries.”

[4] Jonas, Michael. “The Downside of Diversity: A Harvard political scientist finds that diversity hurts civic life. What happens when a liberal scholar unearths an inconvenient truth?” The Boston Globe. August, 2007. Accessed December 20, 2015. versity/?page=full.
EXCERPT: “a massive new study, based on detailed interviews of nearly 30,000 people across America, has concluded just the opposite. Harvard political scientist Robert Putnam -- famous for ‘Bowling Alone,’ his 2000 book on declining civic engagement -- has found that the greater the diversity in a community, the fewer people vote and the less they volunteer, the less they give to charity and work on community projects. In the most diverse communities, neighbors trust one another about half as much as they do in the most homogenous settings. The study, the largest ever on civic engagement in America, found that virtually all measures of civic health are lower in more diverse settings. ‘The extent of the effect is shocking,’ says Scott Page, a University of Michigan political scientist.’”
“Diversity May Not Be the Answer.” Los Angeles Times. August, 2007. Accessed December 20, 2015.
EXCERPT: “But according to a provocative new study by Robert Putnam, one of America's preeminent political scientists, it's just not true. No, Putnam isn’t regurgitating so-called conflict theory -- the notion that diversity strengthens group identities, thereby increasing ethnocentrism and conflict. He’s not predicting racial Armageddon. What he did find in analyzing a massive survey of 30,000 Americans, however, is a whole lot more interesting and complex than either ‘Kumbaya’ or ‘Crash.’ Diversity, he argues, is turning us into a nation of turtles, hunkered down with our heads in our shells. According to the study, there is a strong positive relationship between interracial trust and ethnic homogeneity. In other words, the less diverse your community, the more likely you are to trust the people in it who are different from you. The flip side is also true: The more ethnically diverse the people you live around, the less you trust them. So interracial trust is relatively high in homogenous South Dakota and relatively low in wildly diverse Los Angeles. But don't think it's just because we don’t trust people of different races. In addition to asking respondents what they thought of people from different backgrounds, the survey inquired about whether respondents trusted people of their own race. The answer was surprising. It turns out that in the most diverse places in the country, Americans tend to distrust everyone, those who do look like them and those who don’t. Diversity, therefore, does not result in increased conflict or increased accommodation, but in good old-fashioned anomie and social isolation.”