24.2.15

Humanity's Royal Family

White Race & Christendom
Ancient Israel was a chosen family. God had promised to give the patriarch Abraham as many descendants as the stars in the sky. The Nation of Israel was a flesh and blood (partial) fulfillment of that promise.

Out of this family God chose the Davidic branch of the tribe of Judah to serve as its monarchs. Because of God's favor and David's loyalty the Davidic dynasty gained the divine right to rule over God's chosen people.

In a similar way the coming of Jesus inaugurated the foundation of a new family (or an extension of the old one) in which the nations of the world would be incorporated into the body of Christ. A new nation.

While this is understood and accepted by most Christians one connection that is not often noticed is that God seems to have been silently preparing a new royal branch for his holy nation. While most of the ethnicity's of the world were mired in hedonism the White race, created by a synthesis of the ethnic groups which accepted the Christian religion, remained the defenders and preservers of the Faith.

Over the course of at least a millennia Christianity gave birth to a new European self expression. As at least one scholar has pointed out Christendom itself created the identity of the White race by contrasting White Christian phenotypes with those of pagan peoples:
'[Perkinson] regards whiteness as the hidden offspring of white supremacy, an upshot of Christian supremacy. According to him, white identity took shape as an explicit theological position, "born of European encounter with people, places, and things that fit no clear category on the map of Christian cognition." Soon bodily surfaces were invested with spiritual significance. European light skin colour became a marker for being Christian over against the native's paganism (2004, 156).' [1]
Because Christianity was almost eradicated throughout the non-European world (with some notable exceptions) prior to White imperial expansion in the 15th century, all of Christianity is now more or less synonymous with White self expression because it almost certainly grew out of conversion inducing contact with Europeans.

Gerrie Snyman, an academic, points out: '. . . the [European] missionary came [to Africa] with the idea that he has the truth and the only path to the One God, the Christian deity. Ancestor worship has been regarded as a relapse into sin.' [2]

Because Christianity must completely dominate a person's life to be legitimate any anti-White (i.e anti-Christian) cultural expression possessed by a people group must be eliminated in order to join the fellowship of believers.

The reason Whites do not have to abandon aspects of their own identity to become Christian is that Christianity gave birth to Whites in the first place. The ethnic groups that joined the White race did, however, have to abandon their past identities. This process is painful but in the long run the other races will benefit by conforming to White identity just as the pagan tribes of Europe grew to gain a new and more powerful meaning for themselves inside Christendom.

Because of the current situation, European self-expression becoming synonymous with Christian identity, Whites have been thrust into a leadership role. At this point, White forms of thought and culture have become so dominant that for Whites to reject leadership would almost be irresponsible because there is no people group to take their place. A rejection of the Western expression of Christianity would lead to social, cultural, and spiritual chaos and collapse (as is already the case in Christian theology and manifested in religious observance across the Western world).

For the foreseeable future Whites will continue to be distinct and different from every other race on earth. They appear to have been given the divine right to rule the nations not only because of their past loyalty to God but because God has granted them better genetic predisposition to lead (high IQ, etc.).

Whites appear to be humanity's royal family. And, as with any other family, they have the right to favor each other (make decisions as a group) and maintain their own land (nation-state).

Some will say this assertion is a stretch, that a view of Whites as a royal family is unfounded in scripture. But the Bible often describes the relationships between the world's nations as having a family dynamic. One example being Noah's curse on Canaan's descendants (Genesis 9).

Another example is found in Genesis 25 when God tells Rebekah that her sons will form two great nations who will differ in authority:
'And the Lord said unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger.'
Obedience to God is considered a prerequisite for the success of a nation in Isaiah 60:12: 'For the nation and kingdom that will not serve thee shall perish; yea, those nations shall be utterly wasted.'

By thinking of themselves as the leaders of a renewed Christendom perhaps Whites can reconstruct their identity in a healthy and inspiring way. Rather than miring themselves in the guilt liberals insist Whites must feel for past 'abuses', Whites should view themselves as possessing a unique God given responsibility as leaders. This role innately involves greater scrutiny than the less authority burdened peoples of the earth, and has subsequently opened Whites up to every form of slanderous accusation, but it is a role that will lead to closer communion with God. Whites must not bury their talents.

Whites should avoid confusing their role with superiority. We know that God values all men equally. By Christ's definition, to be a leader is to serve. To serve the cross through leadership is to desire 'a noble task.' (I Timothy 3:1)

NOTES

[1] Snyman, Gerrie. 'African Hermeneutics' 'Outing' of Whiteness.' Neotestamenica 42.1. New Testament Society of South Africa. Page: 108. (2008)
Snyman is commenting on work done by J. W. Perkinson in his article 'White Theology. Outing supremacy in modernity. Black Religion / Womanist Thought / Social Justice.'

[2] Ibid, 109.